IrisRV
Well-Known Member
I admit that I am SO over the whole PACE thing.
It's already heading down the toilet in the US given what the director of the NIH said about these people and their so-called ME research: "They do not have the skillset." PACE is working its way out of our massive medical system, but it will take some time because it's a big system with a lot of inertia. It takes time for the word to get around. Still, it's doomed in the US. It's just a matter of time. I don't think it's a major issue for us anymore. Yes, it's not over, but it hardly needs to be all-consuming for us now.
For the UK... I don't know what to think. PACE and those associated with it are firmly entrenched over there. UK PWME have a bigger fight on their hands.
I'd rather focus on the positive things now -- the beginnings of positive change in the NIH, some serious biomedical research studies both new and ongoing, more and more interest in ME from people previously outside our world (Lipkin, Hornig, Tuller, Coyne, etc)
However, I had to post this PACE-related piece from the Virology blog. It gave me a big goofy grin. I hope it does for you, too.
The list of 42 scientists and clinicians who have now signed the second iteration of this letter is very impressive. Take a look.
http://www.virology.ws/2016/02/10/another-request-for-data-from-the-pace-trial/
It's already heading down the toilet in the US given what the director of the NIH said about these people and their so-called ME research: "They do not have the skillset." PACE is working its way out of our massive medical system, but it will take some time because it's a big system with a lot of inertia. It takes time for the word to get around. Still, it's doomed in the US. It's just a matter of time. I don't think it's a major issue for us anymore. Yes, it's not over, but it hardly needs to be all-consuming for us now.
For the UK... I don't know what to think. PACE and those associated with it are firmly entrenched over there. UK PWME have a bigger fight on their hands.
I'd rather focus on the positive things now -- the beginnings of positive change in the NIH, some serious biomedical research studies both new and ongoing, more and more interest in ME from people previously outside our world (Lipkin, Hornig, Tuller, Coyne, etc)
However, I had to post this PACE-related piece from the Virology blog. It gave me a big goofy grin. I hope it does for you, too.
The list of 42 scientists and clinicians who have now signed the second iteration of this letter is very impressive. Take a look.
http://www.virology.ws/2016/02/10/another-request-for-data-from-the-pace-trial/
On November 13th, five colleagues and I released an open letter to The Lancet and editor Richard Horton about the PACE trial, which the journal published in 2011.
Although Dr. Horton’s office e-mailed that he would respond to our letter when he returned from “traveling,” it has now been almost three months. Dr. Horton has remained silent on the issue. Today, therefore, we are reposting the open letter and resending it to The Lancet and Dr. Horton, with the names of three dozen more leading scientists and clinicians, most of them well-known experts in the ME/CFS field.