It's an amazing story. Hundreds of years of soldiers with PTSD being accused of being psychologically weak or unmanly (god knows how many thousands suffered unfairly) - all of whom probably actually suffered from a physical brain disease.
The New York Times today published a long article (What if PTSD Is More Physical Than Psychological?) on how bomb induced PTSD is probably caused by physical damage to the brain. A researcher has recently uncovered a pattern of brain damage unlike he had ever seen before.
[fright]
[/fright]
Until then shell shock had mostly been viewed in psychological terms:
Early on a doctor named Mott got close to being right about what was going on but his ideas were pushed aside by, among others, Sigmund Freud.
Even in this modern era with the understanding that the blasts from new, more intense bombs with shaped charges were likely causing more damage it took awhile for the Army to get on board.
Macedonia and his ideas were saved by one man high up the chain, Commander of the Joint Chief of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen. Mullen heard the guy out and hired him. (One wonders if Francis Collins is giving the same gift to ME/CFS right now.)
Now things are changing. It's remarkable though that even these tough soldiers have been accused of being shirkers.Even after highly trained special forces soldiers have literally gone crazy and killed themselves, many in the military still thought of the PTSD as "psychological". It demonstrates how deep the belief that something is psychological can get embedded - past all belief, really.
It's notable that it took improved technology to figure what's going on. I think that's good news for ME/CFS and FM.
The New York Times today published a long article (What if PTSD Is More Physical Than Psychological?) on how bomb induced PTSD is probably caused by physical damage to the brain. A researcher has recently uncovered a pattern of brain damage unlike he had ever seen before.
[fright]
What they found in these traumatic-brain-injury cases was totally different: a dustlike scarring, often at the border between gray matter (where synapses reside) and the white matter that interconnects it.
Until then shell shock had mostly been viewed in psychological terms:
Perl’s findings, published in the scientific journal The Lancet Neurology, may represent the key to a medical mystery first glimpsed a century ago in the trenches of World War I. It was first known as shell shock, then combat fatigue and finally PTSD, and in each case, it was almost universally understood as a psychic rather than a physical affliction.
Early on a doctor named Mott got close to being right about what was going on but his ideas were pushed aside by, among others, Sigmund Freud.
Mott’s views were soon eclipsed by those of other doctors who saw shell shock more as a matter of emotional trauma. This was partly a function of the intellectual climate; Freud and other early psychologists had recently begun sketching provocative new ideas about how the mind responds to stress. Soldiers suffering from shell shock were often described as possessing “a neuropathic tendency or inheritance” or even a lack of manly vigor and patriotic spirit. Many shell-shock victims were derided as shirkers; some were even sentenced to death by firing squad after fleeing the field in a state of mental confusion.
Even in this modern era with the understanding that the blasts from new, more intense bombs with shaped charges were likely causing more damage it took awhile for the Army to get on board.
One of the first to challenge the military from within was a 44-year-old Army lieutenant colonel named Christian Macedonia. In March 2008, Macedonia was in Arlington, Va., listening to a group of scientists and government bureaucrats talk about roadside bombs. The talk was dry and technical, and finally Macedonia, a square-jawed man with an air of urgent candor, could no longer contain himself. He lashed out against the military’s inaction on brain injury, using what he recalls as “some pretty salty language” to make his point. “I see no movement, and I’m kind of sick of it,” he concluded.
At the time, “you had an entrenched military-medical community that did not want to go down that road,” Macedonia told me. “They didn’t want to give any credence to the idea that these symptoms were anything other than emotional difficulty.” Macedonia, an obstetrician as well as a soldier, knew otherwise. He did a tour in Anbar province in Iraq in 2004 and 2005 with soldiers who were being targeted frequently by mortars and roadside bombs. As an officer and doctor, he felt responsible for younger soldiers and their injuries. “Kids exposed to explosions were asking for help, and I was mouthing the party line: ‘You’ll be O.K.’ I was part of the machine that didn’t help. That’s what haunts me.”
Macedonia and his ideas were saved by one man high up the chain, Commander of the Joint Chief of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen. Mullen heard the guy out and hired him. (One wonders if Francis Collins is giving the same gift to ME/CFS right now.)
Now things are changing. It's remarkable though that even these tough soldiers have been accused of being shirkers.Even after highly trained special forces soldiers have literally gone crazy and killed themselves, many in the military still thought of the PTSD as "psychological". It demonstrates how deep the belief that something is psychological can get embedded - past all belief, really.
It's notable that it took improved technology to figure what's going on. I think that's good news for ME/CFS and FM.
Last edited: