Not dead yet!
Well-Known Member
There are so many things she said that rubbed me totally the wrong way, but the worst was this: The way she is required to diagnose says that even if she tested someone for something rare like shcisosomiasis (sorry if I spelled it wrong), and it was positive, she would have to disregard it UNLESS THE PERSON SAID THEY HAD BEEN TO GHANA (exactly) and had swum in a specific lake there. She isn't even permitted to retest, even if it was positive the first time. She must ignore it completely as a false positive.
I then said, but there's shciso in the Northern Midwest and in the Caribbean. She said "That's a different schiso."
NOTE: Schiso was just an example, this applies to any rare tropical disease or anything that "developed" countries supposedly don't have.
So....
1. You have to use magic words to be tested. Only the best liars will be tested and treated.
2. They do not permit American MD's to retest you, despite scientifically validated testing methods. So there goes their "evidence based" dogma.
3. I got the impression that there is no "panel" for rare diseases to be tested for, or at least not one that she has access to. Each individual parasitic illness has to be separately tested and possibly ignored or treated based on what a person says in their "medical history."
4. What kind of crap is it to say "that's a different schiso"? Sure there are different species, but the effects are still nasty. Who cares? Why not test for the one a person is likely to have come in contact with? (Is it just me or is that logical?)
5. I had just been reading about it in Pubmed because I was trying to figure out why for the millionth time I have UTI symptoms, with blood and white blood cells but the culture is negative. And a quinolone stops the white blood cells and blood. I'm not convinced I have urogenital schiso, but I had hoped that my contact with the Caribbean and the areas of the US that do have it would've been enough to trigger a test. The symptoms fit extremely well.
The entire thing was depressing but this was by far the most crushing.
I'm tempted to go to Hunter-Hopkins Center right away just because I'm so mad, but I'm not sure that's going to address my body's tendency to allow every infection to run rampant. I'm thinking Dr. Horowitz is a better bet. She claimed that since I didn't have low blood counts, my immune system must be fine.
It was a toxic mix of evidence-based and totally dogmatic lack of logic. I'm amazed she didn't see how she was contradicting herself.
I'm not usually the type to seek the "there there, it will be ok" type of response on forums, but I feel really crushed and could use a bit of support, or even ideas of what to do next.
I then said, but there's shciso in the Northern Midwest and in the Caribbean. She said "That's a different schiso."
NOTE: Schiso was just an example, this applies to any rare tropical disease or anything that "developed" countries supposedly don't have.
So....
1. You have to use magic words to be tested. Only the best liars will be tested and treated.
2. They do not permit American MD's to retest you, despite scientifically validated testing methods. So there goes their "evidence based" dogma.
3. I got the impression that there is no "panel" for rare diseases to be tested for, or at least not one that she has access to. Each individual parasitic illness has to be separately tested and possibly ignored or treated based on what a person says in their "medical history."
4. What kind of crap is it to say "that's a different schiso"? Sure there are different species, but the effects are still nasty. Who cares? Why not test for the one a person is likely to have come in contact with? (Is it just me or is that logical?)
5. I had just been reading about it in Pubmed because I was trying to figure out why for the millionth time I have UTI symptoms, with blood and white blood cells but the culture is negative. And a quinolone stops the white blood cells and blood. I'm not convinced I have urogenital schiso, but I had hoped that my contact with the Caribbean and the areas of the US that do have it would've been enough to trigger a test. The symptoms fit extremely well.
The entire thing was depressing but this was by far the most crushing.
I'm tempted to go to Hunter-Hopkins Center right away just because I'm so mad, but I'm not sure that's going to address my body's tendency to allow every infection to run rampant. I'm thinking Dr. Horowitz is a better bet. She claimed that since I didn't have low blood counts, my immune system must be fine.
It was a toxic mix of evidence-based and totally dogmatic lack of logic. I'm amazed she didn't see how she was contradicting herself.
I'm not usually the type to seek the "there there, it will be ok" type of response on forums, but I feel really crushed and could use a bit of support, or even ideas of what to do next.